Sign in: Staff/Students
Professor Peter Kinderman “The proposed revision of DSM-5 is likely to lead to many millions of people being at risk of receiving invalid and misleading diagnoses”
Psychiatrists and health professionals across the UK and US have joined psychologists at the University of Liverpool to launch an initiative to raise concerns about a forthcoming edition of an American psychiatric handbook.
An influential American psychiatric manual, the American Psychiatric Association’s Diagnostic and Statistical Manual for Mental Disorders – which is used by clinicians and researchers to diagnose and classify mental disorders – has been updated for publication in May 2013.
Psychological reactions to everyday life
Psychologists are concerned that the updated fifth edition – DSM-5 – will increase the number of people in the general population diagnosed with mental illness due to lowered diagnostic threshold levels. It will regard human experiences such as grief, anxiety and stress as mental disorders rather than being social and psychological reactions to everyday life.
A group of psychologists and psychiatrists in the UK and US are voicing their concerns about the reliability, validity and safety of DSM-5 on a website which is being launched later this month. The website provides a detailed scientific and clinical evidence-based critique of DSM-5.
Professor Peter Kinderman, Head of the University’s Institute of Psychology, Health and Society, said: “It is inappropriate to diagnose people who are suffering as a result of ordinary and everyday human experiences, such as grief, as having a mental health problem. The proposed revision of DSM-5 is likely to lead to many millions of people being at risk of receiving invalid and misleading diagnoses.
“Many people experience a profound and long-lasting grieving process following the death of a loved one. Many soldiers returning from conflict suffer from trauma. Many of us are shy and anxious in social situations or unmotivated and pessimistic if we’re unemployed or dislike our jobs.
“It is not right, however, to consider these experiences as symptoms of mental illness that need medical treatment when humane and effective alternatives would be more appropriate.”
Rethink approach to psychiatric diagnosis
Professor Richard Bentall, also at the University’s Institute of Psychology, Health and Society, added: “There is very little evidence that the diagnoses in the previous edition of the DSM have any scientific or clinical value. For example, schizophrenia and bipolar disorder are probably not separate conditions, therefore we need to completely rethink our approach to psychiatric diagnosis, and not merely create a new, worse, version.”
The Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM) is the standard classification of mental disorders used by mental health professionals in the United States.
To read more about the guidelines and the reaction from psychologists, please visit: www.dsm5response.com
You must be logged in to post a comment.
All recent news
Study outlines mechanism behind rare blood clots linked to COVID-19 vaccine
Sex, drugs and rock’n’roll’? Link between taking illegal drugs and non-traditional sex found
Summer Term Events Programme – What’s on during week 2
Introducing Inspired Futures 2021
Take part in the Merseyside Bird Race – 22-23 April
Our paper on immune responses to COVID vaccine (mostly Pfizer) in 237 healthcare workers, 124 #SARSCoV2 naïve and 113 previously infected, from the PITCH consortium @pitchstudy is out as a pre-print today.
See if you can spot us in the new @NetflixUK series, The Irregulars! 📽️
Our @VictoriaGallery appears in it, as well as other locations across the city including St George’s Plateau, the Palm House in Sefton Park and Falkner Street in the Georgian Quarter.
Professor Michael Parkinson CBE, author of 1985's Liverpool on the Brink, and Liverpool Beyond the Brink in 2019, analyses the Caller Report, the Gov's Best Value inspection into Liverpool City Council