Sign in: Staff/Students
People who are admitted to hospital with Covid-19 can be divided into four distinct groups, according to data from the world’s largest study of patients with the disease.
Researchers identified the groups using clinical information and tests carried out upon arrival at hospital to predict the patients’ risk of death – ranging from low to very high.
A Covid-19 risk identification tool – the most accurate to date – has been designed using the groupings to help clinical staff choose the best course of treatment for patients admitted to hospital.
The tool was built by the ISARIC Coronavirus Clinical Characterisation Consortium involving researchers from Universities of Liverpool, Edinburgh, Glasgow and Imperial College London using data from some 35,000 patients admitted to hospital between February and May 2020 who met the criteria for one of the four groups.
The tool was then tested and confirmed to be accurate using data from a further 22,000 patients hospitalised from the end of May to the end of June 2020.
Some of the data used to identify which group a person falls into – and, therefore, their risk of dying – included age, sex, the number of pre-existing conditions, respiratory rate on admission, and the results of two blood tests.
One in every hundred patients in the low-risk group was found to be at risk of dying. It was 10 in a hundred patients in the intermediate-risk group, 31 in a hundred in the high-risk group and 62 in a hundred in the very high-risk group.
The categorisations make new treatment pathways possible, researchers say.
For example, it might be more appropriate for those who fall into the low-risk subgroup to be treated at home. In contrast, people in the high or very high risk groups could benefit from more aggressive treatment, such as the use of antivirals and early admission to critical care.
Until now there has not been an accurate risk tool for Covid-19 patients. Existing tools for pneumonia or sepsis do not offer accurate predictions due to the differences between diseases.
Previous attempts to build a risk prediction tool for Covid-19 have had limited success due to small sample sizes and lack of formal validation. One limitation of this new tool, however, is that it can only be used on hospital patients and not within the community.
The work is the latest result from ISARIC – a global network of clinicians and scientists who have been preparing to prevent disease and death from severe outbreaks since 2012 in readiness for a pandemic such as this. It involved 260 hospitals across England, Wales and Scotland. The ISARIC 4C study includes two thirds of all people admitted to hospital with Covid-19.
The research was funded by UK Research and Innovation (UKRI) and by the Department of Health and Social Care through the National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) as part of the UK Government’s Covid-19 rapid research response.
Professor Calum Semple, Chief Investigator and Professor in Outbreak Medicine and Child Health at the University of Liverpool, said: “This winter is likely to see great pressures on our health services, with staff being redeployed to less familiar acute care areas. In these difficult circumstances the 4C mortality score is likely to be a valuable tool for supporting decisions that allowing prompt escalation of care to those most likely to benefit. The scale of success of the ISARIC 4C study is testament to the group’s commitment in preparing for pandemic public health research.”
Professor Ewen Harrison, Senior author and Professor of Surgery and Data Science at the University of Edinburgh, said: “As doctors, we want to identify groups of patients most at risk of dying from Covid-19. If we can do that at the front door of the hospital, then treatment can be better planned. This easy-to-use tool will help doctors make decisions to provide patients with the optimal care.”
Professor Fiona Watt, Executive Chair of the Medical Research Council, part of UKRI, said: “These results highlight the benefits of being prepared in advance of the emergence of new pandemics such as COVID-19. ISARIC is a global network of clinicians and scientists that was set up in 2012 in readiness for a pandemic such as COVID-19, and its value is evident from the findings described today.”
The co lead authors of the study were Dr Antonia Ho, Clinical Senior Lecturer and Consultant in Infectious Diseases at the University of Glasgow; and Dr Stephen Knight, NIHR Clinical Research Fellow at the University of Edinburgh.
Risk stratification of patients admitted to hospital with covid-19 using the ISARIC WHO Clinical Characterisation Protocol: development and validation of the 4C Mortality Score, BMJ 2020;370:m3339, https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.m3339
All recent news
People of colour: there’s a bias in how pictures are used in global health publications
Management School to host online business brunch with Senior Bank of England Economist
Making use of the Report + Support tool
Expected industrial action dates – February and March
University’s Concordat governance lauded for being “transformative”
On Friday 10th Feb, @UoLManSchool, in collaboration with @LpoolCityRegion Growth Platform, are hosting a free online webinar with Senior @bankofengland #economist Ryland Thomas to discuss the UK economy.
All are welcome, read more here 👉https://news.liverpool.ac.uk/2023/01/27/management-school-to-host-online-business-brunch-with-senior-bank-of-england-economist/
From @IrishInstitute and @LivUniEnglish Dr Eleanor Lybeck @NellLybeck has written for @ConversationUK about the use of the #circus as a political metaphor. 🤡🎪
Read the article in full here 👉https://theconversation.com/how-the-circus-became-the-metaphor-of-choice-in-political-rhetoric-197973
The authors of a new report (inc @livuni Prof David Taylor-Robinson) have warned that rising living costs will lead to immediate and lifelong harms for children in the North of England and have called on government to act now #ChildoftheNorth