Dr Stuart Wilks-Heeg is a Senior Lecturer in Social Policy at the University of Liverpool
“In the event that an in/out referendum on UK membership of the EU is held in 2017, and a majority of voters opt to leave, what process would need to be followed to secure the UK’s exit?
The question is more complex than it might seem. To start with, there’s no real precedent. Other than Greenland, no autonomous state has previously left the EU or its forerunners. There’s also disagreement about whether the UK would need to negotiate exit formally and about what sort of relationship it should, or could, aim to have with the remaining member states.
As Paul Simon didn’t quite say, there must be 50 ways to leave the EU.
Just follow the rules, Jules
Formally, for a member state to leave the EU, it needs to follow the process set out in Article 50 of the Treaty of Lisbon. Under the treaty, voluntary secession is initiated by a member state informing the European Council, which then draws up guidelines for a negotiated withdrawal settlement. Once approved by the European Parliament, the Council has the authority to agree a settlement on a qualified majority basis.
Don’t pay the Bill, Jill
However, an alternative approach has been advocated by some proponents of a UK exit who argue the UK could leave the EU overnight, if necessary. Parliament would repeal the European Communities Act 1972, the government would cease to make payments to the EU, and the UK would no longer be a member of the EU. Could it really be as simple as ripping up the contract and cancel the direct debit? Well, Douglas Carswell MP proposed pretty much exactly this in a Private Members Bill in the House of Commons in October 2012.
The ‘just walk away approach’ would leave parliament with the task on unpicking a vast number of EU Directives embedded in other legislation, as Carswell recognises. It also makes two big assumptions. The first is that the EU could not prevent a UK exit because the UK Parliament is sovereign and Article 50 of the Treaty of Lisbon is legally meaningless. In practice, this may turn out to be the case, but dismissing the treaty is unlikely to win the UK any friends.
The second assumption is that unilateral exit would not prejudice any subsequent trade and treaty agreements between the UK and the EU. Carswell and others argue the UK’s negotiating position would be strong because the EU would be desperately keen to retain Western Europe’s second largest national economy in its free trade area. Whether our former EU partners would be so easily persuaded that the weight of economic pragmatism should trump significant issues of diplomatic principle is, in reality, far from certain.
Get a trade deal, Neil
However the UK’s exit were initiated, agreement of favourable trading terms with the EU would be essential. Half of UK trade is with Europe.
Two countries provide a potential model for a UK outside the EU: Switzerland and Norway. Both are part of the European Free Trade Area. However, the respective bases of their relationship with the EU are quite different. Switzerland has the looser arrangement, based on bilateral agreements, but is still subject to many EU regulations.
Norway, as part of the European Economic Area has a closer relationship with the EU. In return it makes financial contributions to the EU and must conform to the great majority of its regulations while having no say in determining them. British Eurosceptics may want to be careful what they wish for.
Catch lots of fish, Trish
And what of the one country that did leave? After securing home rule from Denmark in 1979, Greenlanders voted narrowly in favour of leaving what was then the EEC in 1982. The Greenland Treaty, which came into force in 1985, agreed the terms of Greenland’s exit. To this day, Greenland retains generous quotas for the export of fish to the EU and receives €25 million per annum in EU grants. Greenland’s Prime Minister reports that life is good outside the EU but also admits “We don’t export anything else but the fish”.
There may well be 50 ways to leave the EU. Whether the UK would ultimately find any of them to its liking is quite another matter.”
