It was long thought that DNA, together with the genes encoded in it, determined genetic destiny. But equally important is coordinating when genes are turned on and off. In fact, the regulation of gene expression defines life by allowing organisms to react to their surroundings rather than being static automatons. As even the smallest organisms like bacteria have many genes, coordinating their expression is done by a dedicated set of proteins, which bind specific sites in the DNA (called ‘promoters’) in order to turn genes on or off. Each such pairing between a protein and its associated promoter constitutes one of many connections in the organismal gene regulatory network. Gene regulatory networks are intricately tuned, so how can they evolve and change?
In a study published in Nature Ecology and Evolution, a team of researchers including Dr Jonathan Bollback from the University’s Institute of Integrative Biology and scientists at the Institute of Science and Technology Austria describes how individual regulatory connections can change over time.
Usually, gene regulatory networks are studied at the global level, with researchers seeking to understand how the properties of the network as a whole determine its evolution. However, Igler and her team decided to study network evolution from the local perspective in order to understand how connections in the network change. To do so, they used two DNA-binding proteins and their associated promoters. These proteins are called repressors, as their binding to DNA inhibits gene expression.
The researchers then introduced mutations into the promoters and observed how these changes affected the binding of repressors. Repressors can react to changes in two ways, first author Claudia Igler from the Institute of Science and Technology Austria says: “A repressor can be robust, meaning that mutations do not affect it much since it maintains binding to a promoter despite the mutations. Alternatively, a repressor can be evolvable, which means that it readily responds to mutations by acquiring binding to new promoters. These two responses to mutations seem to be, by definition, mutually exclusive—a protein that is more robust to mutations ought to respond to mutations less, and should hence be less evolvable.”
But, as is often the case, biology is full of surprises. Comparing the two repressors, the researchers found that the more robust repressor acquired binding to new promoters more readily.
By developing a biophysical model based on the thermodynamics of protein-DNA binding, the researchers were not only able to explain their surprising observations, but could generalise their findings, as Claudia Igler describes: “How repressors react to mutations in their binding sites indicates how they can function within the regulatory network. One group of repressors, the local ones, are very specific—they bind only to a handful of promoters and do not acquire new binding easily. Another group of repressors, the global ones, is promiscuous and keeps on binding to their promoter even when it is heavily mutated, while also easily starting to bind new sites.”
The Institute of Science and Technology Austria team was made up of Calin Guet, Gašper Tkačik, Claudia Igler (PhD student in Calin Guet’s group) and Mato Lagator (Postdoc in the Guet group).
Evolutionary potential of transcription factors for gene regulatory rewiring. Nature Ecology & Evolution, 2018; DOI: 10.1038/s41559-018-0651-y