Dr Carri Westgarth, from the Institute of Infection and Global Health, is a dog researcher; trainer; behaviourist and owner, as well as a Full Member of the Association of Pet Behaviour Counsellors. She holds a Medical Research Council Research Fellowship – ‘Understanding dog ownership and walking for better human health’.
We love dogs. One in four households in the UK own a dog, and we adore them like members of our family. We also love watching TV shows about dogs, and that includes Crufts every March, ‘the greatest dog show in the world’. Some of us are even lucky enough to be able to attend in person during these four days where the dog-obsessed unite under one massive roof and nobody looks out-of-place.
Whilst we are engrossed in the breathtaking displays of agility and obedience, celebrating accolades of responsible dog ownership, and shedding a tear over life-changing partnerships, it is sometimes easy to forget the real reason it exists – so that breeders and handlers can compete for the ultimate prestige. It brings a whole new meaning to the phrase ‘status dogs’, most commonly used to describe very different societal groups.
The perfect dog
Inherent to this drive for the perfect dog, is the ongoing controversy over the welfare of dogs deliberately judged on and bred to maximise gross mutations of the archetypal dog form. Although arguably ‘healthier’ crossbreeds do attend the show for activities other than the show ring, this is the first year Crufts hosted the ‘Scrufts’ final exclusively for crossbreeds. A positive step no doubt, but as a Sam Gaines of the RSPCA so eloquently puts it “over the next four days, four dogs will be judged on health, welfare and behaviour; 20,568 will be judged on their appearance.”
The problems with breeding for these extreme features are fairly self explanatory. The Kennel Club may have introduced veterinary checks for the most worrisome breeds but the discussion that follows within dog behaviour experts often centres on more subtle welfare issues. For example this year we had the ‘Best in Group’ Skye and Tibetan terriers that are promoted as ideal with a long gleaming coat, including flowing thickly over the face. This could easily lead to the development of fears and anxiety, because the dog simply can’t see what is going on around it.
One question keeps gnawing at me – is this for our enjoyment or theirs? Watch closely and subtle signs of stress are rife in the show ring– yawning, lip smacking, sometimes even biting – and these are dogs supposedly well trained for the experience. From having previously handled qualified Assistance Dogs at the event I know that even just being in the environment is extremely stressful to any but the most ‘bomb proof’ dog. Last year I observed a sniffer dog on a stall barking incessantly and the handler obviously getting rather annoyed with it. Even an ‘expert’ often doesn’t recognise not-so-subtle signs of an unhappy dog.
Concerns extend beyond the show ring too. Whilst research suggests that up to three-quarters of our pet dogs enjoy a walk every day, I wonder how many show dogs permanently miss out on the prime joy of being a dog – having a good romp in the woods – because they must not spoil their pristine coat? Many will live in kennels and so will their puppies, to be sold on as pets. But not being brought up inside a busy home is detrimental to good socialisation and can lead to behaviour problems.
Apparently knowledgeable and acclaimed breeders can often give incredibly misguided ‘expert’ advice with no appreciation of the impact on dog welfare. I have lost count, for example, of the number of manic and severely stressed Siberian Huskies that turn up at my dog training classes once they reach adolescence and that have “never been let off the lead because the breeder told me not to.”
So should events like Crufts be banned then? Absolutely not. Dogs are (for the most part) highly beneficial to our physical and mental health and should be celebrated and promoted in our society. This year the presenters repeated the mantra of celebrating ‘happy, healthy dogs’; a positive sign. It really has been great to watch long wagging tails of traditionally docked breeds and so refreshing to see only one squished face amongst the seven contenders for ‘Best in Show’.
When last week I suggested writing this piece we joked “wouldn’t it be extraordinary if a Labrador won this year?!” … and would you believe it he actually came second! Most of all, we must not forget that the people attending and competing in Crufts do love dogs – if they didn’t they wouldn’t be there and it would not exist. But in the words of behaviourist Morag Heirs, “this year I came away feeling that the Kennel Club has done one hell of a lot to save its reputation, but you only have to scratch under the surface to see there is still a long way to go.”
I think Crufts actually works as some positive PR for dog ownership in the face of numerous examples of the negative sort. Sure, there were some extreme examples (including an apparently overweight 2nd overall labrador, and an “extreme type” GSD which won best of breed) but there were also lots of incredible “pro-dogs as pets/assistance animals” moments (Owen and Haatchi, anyone?). I think its move to More 4 has been positive, and it had a much more welfare-orientated slant this year. Lots of advice on how to buy a puppy responsibly, for example, and publicity for the Retired Greyhound Trust. I have started to watch Crufts again.
I completely agree Carol and I am glad that you are enjoying watching it again.
Thanks for your comment Nicola. I agree that there is a need to tackle veterinary issues such as Syringomyelia and I believe that the Kennel Club is making efforts to address these. However I disagree with your belief that events such as Crufts do not care about the animals. I feel that they care a lot. The problem is that when we are very close to things and love them, such as humans about dogs, it can be difficult to step outside of the situation and see things more objectively. I am sure that breeders, people competing at the events (including agility etc) care for their dogs very much, as do the Kennel Club. In some ways the dogs are very much spoiled and loved! But, for example, this passion may make it difficult to recognise the signs that a dog might not be enjoying something as much as we are or as much as we’d like them to.
Whilst I agree that Crufts should not be banned outright there should be a significant move to ban breeds which have been shown to have the worst welfare, for example British Bulldogs, and to seriously revise the breed standards for many others. There should be more inclusion of advanced veterinary screening to remove animals with genetic malformations like Syringomyelia and valvular heart disease in King Charles Spaniels. Neutered animals should be allowed to enter so that it is about good, healthy examples of breeds winning, not just a platform for breeders to charge extra for the offspring of champions. All this and more is needed before Crufts can be said to actually care about the animals that attend it.
You must be logged in to post a comment.
All recent news
University officially accredited as Living Wage Employer
IET Innovation Award shortlist showcases Engineering Impact
GALLERY: Marking thirty years since the fall of the Berlin Wall
Competition: Share your photos and videos and you could win a £50 Red Letter Days voucher
National anti-slavery award for law academic
New £2m Liverpool-led #PRONTO study seeks to inform better use of antibiotics in #sepsis http://bit.ly/2NYE6w9
GALLERY: Marking thirty years since the fall of the Berlin Wall - Prof Anna Saunders, Head of @livunilanguages, was in the German capital to witness the scenes.
Click through for the full Gallery 👉👉 https://news.liverpool.ac.uk/2019/11/11/gallery-marking-thirty-years-since-the-fall-of-the-berlin-wall/
“We’re accidentally preparing our children for the wrong century” - @drpaulredmond speaking of the rise of Zombie Jobs and automation. 🧟♂️🤖 #TEDxLiverpool