Dr Stephanie Petrie is an Honorary Senior Research Fellow in the University of Liverpool’s School of Law and Social Justice
“Kris Hopkins, the current housing minister, responding to the recent report on housing in the UK by UN special rapporteur Raquel Rolnik, accused the international organisation of being ‘misled by a Marxist diatribe’. So which of Rolnik’s recommendations could be considered to be an ideologically driven approach to housing tenure?
The recommendations of the report[i] are simply that:
These are hardly radical recommendations.
In the UK, housing has been a recognised public health issue since the mid-19thC when successive Acts and Royal Commissions sought to address problems such as rising rents and static wages. In the 20th C the Labour government’s failure to deal with the acute post-WWII housing shortage enabled the Conservatives to win the 1951 election by a campaign that pledged a build programme of 300,000 dwellings in the first year – which was achieved through increased council house completions.
The consequences of the global recession that began in 2007 and subsequent austerity policies of the Coalition government elected in 2010 have had a disastrous impact on the living conditions of many people in the UK as identified by Rolnik and detailed in her report. The recession was, of course, caused by global mismanagement of risk in the banking and financial sectors not public sector expenditure.
The consequences of the recession in the UK, including redundancies, casualisation of labour and low wages exposed many home-owners to personal financial catastrophe. Between 2007 and 2009 the number of foreclosed mortgages nearly doubled yet surprisingly enough the number of homeless families fell by more than 20,000 because of the social housing programme and benefits instituted by the New Labour government.
Kris Hopkins described the UN report as inaccurate yet there is substantial evidence from Housing Associations, charities and researchers in the UK that the ‘Bedroom Tax’ has exacerbated and not alleviated housing problems. There are large increases in the numbers of vacant three and four- bedroom properties, as tenants cannot afford to rent them. Together with increasing costs of private sector lets this has led to a rise in families living in sub-standard, over-crowded accommodation.
Furthermore, despite the prime minister’s promise of the ‘Big Society’, stable and supportive community networks have been destroyed as people move out and properties are left empty. The likely consequences of these policies were well known to the government as they had been predicted by their own department and committees.
Why, then, is the government so resistant to policy critique from the UN? The charge of being driven by an ideological discourse to the exclusion of evidence seems better fitted to this government than the UN rapporteur.”
You must be logged in to post a comment.
All recent news
Investors come to Liverpool for first Investor-University pitching event
Simon O’Brien to host Low Carbon Eco-Innovatory event for businesses
New Cochrane Group office officially opened at Alder Hey
Study abroad opportunities – deadline approaching
University IT updates when you need them
Congratulations to @livuni #Computing student Nachi Kaluba for her winning pitch in our #Unilever & #Livunicareers innovation challenge competition at @MIF_UoL yesterday evening!
#Enterprise #Innovation #Livuni
Gave a brief overview of #Churchill's legacy for @BBCBreakfast this morning from 8.40am onwards! Available to watch again from here: https://t.co/wLgpdFs4Yg @BBCNews @LivUniPol @LivUni @livuninews
#LSTM announces upcoming Secret Art of Survival exhibition https://t.co/yFJUUThUH2