Sign in: Staff/Students
Dr John Sturzaker is a Lecturer in the University’s Department of Geography and Planning:
“George Osborne has proposed yet another round of planning reform, by my count at least the seventh in the last 18 years.
This round, as with most of the others is because, according to the Government’s Fixing the foundations: Creating a more prosperous nation report, England’s “excessively strict planning system” is responsible for the fact that “The UK has been incapable of building enough homes to keep up with growing demand”.
The report points to the previous two rounds of reform over the last Parliament as being successful, because “planning permissions and housing starts are at 7 year highs”.
There are two problems with this argument. The first is that the increase (or decrease) in the number of houses being built in the country has very little to do with the planning system.
The increase in planning permissions and housing starts in the last few years correlates almost exactly with growth in the global and national economy – as more people can afford to buy houses, so the amount of houses built increases. This is basic economics.
The second that to blame the “planning system” is disingenuous at best.
Planning is simply a tool to assist with decision-making. The system, or indeed planners themselves, do not make these decisions – politicians do.
The hard fact for George Osborne is that politicians have, over the last twenty years and more, declined to grant planning permission for new housing in the areas where it is most needed. The principal reason for this is that we, the electorate, do not generally welcome more houses being built near us – we’re worried about traffic, the local environment, the view from our windows, and ultimately often our house prices.
We are not afraid of telling our elected representatives this, often in the strongest terms. Since turkeys don’t vote for Christmas, politicians are not going to do something which is guaranteed to provoke local disgruntlement and a consequent risk to their seat – whether local council or parliamentary.
Nothing in this latest batch of reforms addresses this fundamental contradiction – as a nation, we need more houses, but very few of us want to see them built near where we live.”
You must be logged in to post a comment.
All recent news
Blog: Learning new things during lockdown
Renewed funding for national childhood arthritis research centre
Canvas: Here’s what you need to do to get ready
Certain occupations may be associated with higher rates of heavy drinking
World’s only Masters in The Beatles, Music Industry and Heritage launched
We're thrilled to announce the launch of the world's first Masters in The Beatles, Music Industry and Heritage. 👏🎵
Find out more here ➡️ https://news.liverpool.ac.uk/2021/02/24/world-first-masters-in-the-beatles-music-industry-and-heritage-launched/
Research by @livuniplanning into housing needs in Scotland has resulted in the investment of £3.4billion into affordable new homes by the Scottish Government ➡️https://bit.ly/3bynB5H
The #COVID19 pandemic has had negative impacts on many, including women in research. Sarah Arrowsmith, Postdoctoral Research Associate at @livuniITM, writes about the struggles of juggling being an academic and parent, and what's being done to help.