New research published in Addiction, conducted by researchers from the Universities of Liverpool and Sheffield, highlights the potential benefits of reducing the standard serving size of alcoholic beverages.
It is well known that alcohol consumption contributes to premature death and ill health, and alcohol-related harm places a substantial burden on society. Many drinkers find it hard to cut down and attempts to cut down often do not lead to actual reductions in alcohol consumption. Therefore, changes to the environment that make it easier for people to drink less could have a substantial impact on public health.
One potential environmental influence on alcohol consumption is serving size. Nutrition research consistently shows that portion sizes affect how much a person eats. People eat more if they are given a relatively large portion of food compared to smaller portions, but they do not compensate for this by eating less later on. However, the effect that serving size has on alcohol consumption has not been examined until now. The present research aimed to investigate if reducing the serving size of alcoholic beverages would reduce alcohol consumption.
Standard vs Reduced serving sizes
The researchers, led by Dr Inge Kersbergen from the University of Liverpool, tested the effects of reducing the serving size of alcohol on how much alcohol participants drank in two studies.
In the first study, participants were randomized to consume alcohol from standard or reduced serving sizes whilst watching a one-hour TV programme in a laboratory that looks like a living room. Standard serving sizes contained 2.07 units per serving (equivalent to a pint of weak lager) and reduced serving sizes contained 25% less than the standard serving.
In the second study, participants were invited to one of four pub quiz nights in a local bar which only sold standard vs. reduced serving sizes. Standard servings were pints and 175ml of wine (‘typically served as a medium glass in pubs’) and reduced servings were 2/3 pints and 125ml of wine (‘small glass’). Drink prices were adjusted to make sure that the standard and reduced serving sizes were the same value for money. Researchers observed how much alcohol each participant drank.
In both experiments, participants could order as many drinks as they wanted for the duration of the experiment. This means that participants drinking from reduced servings could compensate for the smaller serving size by ordering more drinks if they wanted to.
The researchers found that participants who were served relatively smaller servings drank less alcohol in a single drinking session than participants who were served standard servings. In the first study, reduced serving sizes led to a 20.7% – 22.3% decrease in alcohol consumption over a one-hour drinking period in the ‘living room’ lab. In the second study, reduced serving sizes led to a 32.4% – 39.6% decrease alcohol consumption over a longer drinking period (up to three hours) during the real-life pub quiz.
Based on the results the researchers used the Sheffield Alcohol Policy Model to estimate that reducing the standard serving size of beer, wine and cider in bars and restaurants by a quarter would lead to 1,400 fewer deaths and 73,000 fewer hospital admissions every year.
Public health intervention
Dr Kersbergen, said: “These studies are the first to demonstrate that reducing the serving size of alcoholic beverages prompts reductions in alcohol consumption.
“The typical serving size of beer in the UK of a pint is larger than many other countries and the size of wine servings in UK bars and restaurants has increased in recent decades, so there is room for serving sizes to be reduced without making them unrealistically small. Reducing the standard serving size of alcohol in bars and restaurants may be an effective way to reduce alcohol consumption at the population level and improve public health.”
Professor Matt Field, a University of Liverpool researcher who was involved in the study, added: “Reducing the standard serving size of alcoholic drinks could automatically prompt people to drink less, even if they are not motivated to cut down. But at the same time, the total amount that people consume would remain completely their own choice”.
Dr Eric Robinson, a University of Liverpool researcher who was also involved in the study, said: “Our research showed that people do not seem to compensate for the smaller servings by ordering more drinks on a single night and it seems unlikely that any further compensation would happen, but future research is needed to find out if people may compensate in other ways, such as drinking more often or getting stronger drinks.”
The full study, entitled ‘Reducing the standard serving size of alcoholic beverages prompts reductions in alcohol consumption’, can be found here and was funded in part by an MRC research grant awarded to Dr Eric Robinson.
As the organiser of the Liverpool beer festival and therefore have some experience in this matter I can see a flaw in the logic and the experiment. The assumption is that you drink until sated. I disagree, the limiting factor for those in the pub quiz would be the number of times they had to go to the bar to order another drink. When in a pub or restuarant, waiting or leaving another activity to be served is the limiting factor and not the amount of alcohol perceived. This is why drinking at home is actually more a problem than drinking in a pub as this limit does not apply. This is the reason why drinkers prefer pints to halves as that means less trips to the bar. Some pubs or festivals serve a 3 x third pint beer tasting boards and do not see a reduction in consumption from serving in pints. To be sure of your assumption you need to repeat the experiment but offer 3 x third pints tasting boards to one group and pints to the other.
You must be logged in to post a comment.
All recent news
Open letter from Liverpool’s universities following the introduction of further COVID-19 restrictions across Merseyside
Mosquito-borne viruses linked to stroke
Match-fixing Red Button app to go global following study
20: Ethics of Care
We’ve known for over a century that our environment shapes our health, so why are we still blaming unhealthy lifestyles?
“We have a critical, time sensitive opportunity. If we act now we can reverse the trajectory”
Prof @louiseckenny speaking to @chamiltonbbc on @bbcmerseyside following the news #Merseyside will have further #COVID__19 restrictions
https://bbc.in/35QpOs6 (>31m 50s)
In response to the additional local restrictions announced today, #Liverpool’s universities and Students’ Unions have issued a joint open letter https://bit.ly/32FEg48
Being infected by two mosquito-borne viruses, #Zika and #chikungunya, at the same time may be a trigger for #stroke, a new study by @LivUni_IVES researchers and Brazilian collaborators has found.