Professor Michael Gordon is an expert in UK constitutional law at University of Liverpool Law School
The Speaker’s ruling that there must be some substantial change in the terms of the Prime Minister’s EU withdrawal deal before the House of Commons could vote on it a third time will disrupt any government plans to hold ‘meaningful vote 3’ before the EU summit starting on 21 March.
The government may now therefore have to discuss two possible extensions with the EU – one would be a short, ‘technical’ extension until the end of June, which could come into effect if Parliament approved the current withdrawal deal before the current scheduled exit date of 29 March.
The other kind of extension would be longer, perhaps for one or two years, which might reset the Brexit process – whether through a general election changing the decision makers in Parliament and the negotiators in government, or a further referendum revisiting the original decision.
The Speaker’s decision is not an absolute barrier to holding a further vote on a withdrawal agreement before 29 March – if a majority in the Commons wants to support the government’s deal, it could also vote to suspend the procedural rule which prevents the same business being voted on multiple times in one parliamentary session.
But it is still genuinely unclear whether a majority exists to do any of these things – in that sense, while the procedures of the House of Commons are grabbing the headlines, the underlying issue remains almost exactly the same: what substantive outcome of the Brexit negotiations, if any, can attract the support of a majority in Parliament? If it is the will of the Commons to support the Prime Minister’s deal, there will still be some opportunity to demonstrate this.
You must be logged in to post a comment.
All recent news
Obituary: Benny Pollack
Risk factors associated with severe and fatal cases of COVID-19 identified
Architecture academics on the view from your lockdown window
COVID-19 and alcohol – a dangerous cocktail
University lockdown lecturer engages with new audience online
"Just because Boris Johnson and the Prince of Wales have had #Covid19 doesn’t mean the disease strikes all people equally"
New @bmj_latest piece by @livuniHLS Profs Dame Margaret Whitehead, Ben Barr & David Taylor-Robinson #healthinequalities #LivUniCovid https://go.shr.lc/2LU5Gdm
We are not “all in it together”—less privileged in society are suffering the brunt of the damage https://blogs.bmj.com/bmj/2020/05/22/covid-19-we-are-not-all-in-it-together-less-privileged-in-society-are-suffering-the-brunt-of-the-damage/
@felly500 @BWDDPH @martinmckee @AbdulRazaq_PH @SimonCapewell99 @ProfBambra
Dr @soozaphone on @LivUniPsyc's new ‘Coping with COVID podcast’ that provides psychological support to medical, allied health professions and nursing students working in the #NHS during the #COVIDー19 pandemic.
More info https://bit.ly/2A5IOET